About

Current agricultural practices affecting soil quality in hilly terrain plots. Through this project we would like to quantify soil erosion risk on hilly terrains associated to 3 different agricultural practices (herbicides, mowing natural vegetation, cover crops). In addition, we want to understand the added value of cover crops in an olive orchard, and relate the outcomes with existing policies. In order to measure soil erosion, we have established a surface run-off collection system which allows us to take samples and separate the sediments in a simply way.

The primary objectives include:

• Comparative analysis to assess and compare soil erosion risk associated to three soil management practices.
• Soil conservation effectiveness to identify and suggest practices that provide solutions for mitigating soil erosion on hilly terrains.
• Knowledge dissemination of the findings and knowledge generated through Living lab approach.
• Promotion of EU and national regulations in agriculture (CAP directives)

Soil management technology can be applied in various ecological contexts to support agricultural activities such as: Agricultural Landscapes Watershed Management Ecological Restoration Projects Soil Conservation and Land Management Programs It is important to adapt the technology to the specific ecological context, considering factors such as local climate, soil types, vegetation cover, and land use practices. By doing so, the technology can contribute to informed decision-making, effective soil erosion control, and the preservation of ecological balance in diverse ecological contexts.

Some of the main constraints could be:

Accuracy in the data collection and analysis
Time and Resource Constraints
Weather Variability
Accessibility and Terrain Constraints
Land Ownership and Collaboration

Addressing these constraints requires careful planning, coordination, and collaboration with relevant stakeholders. Mitigation strategies may involve incorporating adaptive study designs, leveraging existing data sources, engaging with landowners and farmers, seeking funding and partnerships, and ensuring compliance with legal and ethical requirements. By overcoming these constraints, the project can proceed smoothly and provide valuable insights into soil erosion risks associated with different agricultural practices on hilly terrains.

Additional contraindications could be:

Economic: May include additional costs due to increased labour work in the field.
Social: May arise from resistance to change traditional farming practices.
Environmental: No contraindications forseen at the moment.

Indexes

SM is linking to agricultural communities, land rehabilitation and restoration projects, sustainable agriculture and organic farming initiatives, urban agriculture, agroecology and permaculture systems. By implementing effective soil management techniques, among others communities can enhance agricultural productivity, farm biodiversity and groundwater recharge to promote environmental sustainability and secure the well-being for present and future generations.

Some important background information could be:

Awareness and Education
Technical Expertise
Demonstrable Benefits
Financial Incentives
Supportive Policies and Regulations
Collaboration and Partnerships
Access to Funding and Financing

By considering these background factors, stakeholders can create an enabling environment that encourages end-users to adopt and commercialize sustainable water management technologies. It is essential to address knowledge gaps, provide incentives, showcase benefits, and establish supportive policies and partnerships to maximize the adoption and impact of the solution.

Have you had the opportunity to try this technology?
Leave your feedback and we will publish it.

Indicators

Do you want to learn more about the suitability of our technologies?

Use our solution finder to check the usability of this technology in your area or agricultural business.